Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naked Women's Wrestling League
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Naked Women's Wrestling League
AfDs for this article:
- Naked Women's Wrestling League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested Prod. Deleted page lacked sources and the reason given for the prod was Notability not Established. Procedural nomination from undeleting admin and no opinion offered
]- See also the ]
- Comment: This AfD page was created but an afd tag never placed on the article. I have rectified this. My own comments: The entries in Playboy, etc. and the Carmen Electra lawsuit would seem to imply that there is some limited notability here. However, there are no sources to these claims. The article needs reliable sources. Corvus cornixtalk 18:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (although it's a regrettable keep because I would have loved to have added this to Wikipedia:Deleted articles with freaky titles.) Seems to have quite a lot of coverage - [1] [2] [3] [4].--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 18:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it was deleted then restored. I can add it there!--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, unfortunately. They've had a couple of pay per views, and the Carmen Electra involvement also helps. I've seen some reviews of their "shows" on the internet (complete with thankfully censored pictures...these are not the prettiest human beings) which may or may not count as sources, but I am not willingly looking for them again. --UsaSatsui (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In serious need of improvement but Keep. Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) 14:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.