Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Freeman Patchen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Freeman Patchen

Nancy Freeman Patchen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable bio with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, an average writer. --
  Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, fails
  WP:BIO. Non-notable writer. Two Google News searches on this writer return nothing. Cunard (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.