Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NateGames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NateGames

NateGames (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of

• Weak Delete Games (or any app for that matter) published for iPhone/iPod/iPad must be individually licensed by Apple. Usually this means a certain quality threshold must be met, and this in it of itself might be an assertion of notability, although the complete lack of sources bothers me quite a bit.
  says you, says two 22:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) Marasmusine (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - a couple of their games have received reviews, but there's no information on the company in secondary sources. No information means no article. Marasmusine (talk) 21:33, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]