Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Masen-McCray
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Nathan Masen-McCray
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nathan Masen-McCray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
KH-1 (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the KH-1 (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the KH-1 (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage outside of self-published sources, fails ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: This is extremely obvious promo. Fun co-incidence that the name of the original editor is the name of a character in one of the stories. -- asilvering (talk) 00:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I am not exactly wonderstruck by this article. At first glance I was quite enchanted by it, but then I realised that it's based only on a single self-published source, and a blog at that. When I looked closer the promotional spin became clear, and I was left feeling very much disenchanted. In all seriousness it's total rubbish, lacks notability, there are clear COI issues, and if I saw it it would've gone straight to CSD, though it is probably better off here. talk) 07:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.