Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Academy of Sports Medicine
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
National Academy of Sports Medicine
- National Academy of Sports Medicine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Unreferenced advertisement for non-notable company. GBooks includes books published by the company, but nothing about it. GNews has a number of press releases and passing references. No significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Pburka (talk) 00:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company. The name makes it sound like a professional organization or school, but it's just a commercial venture and does not appear to have received significant coverage. --MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, what's up) 00:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the notability of the subject is not established by the article or the single given reference. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.