Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Thirani Bagri
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Neha Thirani Bagri
- Neha Thirani Bagri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails
t@lk to M£ 23:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
]
- Keep. She seems notable. There are several refernces and she has received a scholarship just now. --EileenSanda (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Having received a scholarship is not an evidence of t@lk to M£ 15:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)]
- I know, but they call it "Award", here is this page not about an award? --EileenSanda (talk) 16:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Whichever name they call it, award or scholarship. It is not a significant award and can not in anyway pass her for t@lk to M£ 03:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Whichever name they call it, award or scholarship. It is not a significant award and can not in anyway pass her for
- I know, but they call it "Award", here is this page not about an award? --EileenSanda (talk) 16:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Having received a scholarship is not an evidence of
- Note: This debate has been included in the t@lk to M£ 23:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the t@lk to M£ 23:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the t@lk to M£ 23:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the t@lk to M£ 23:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Delete per nominator. I'm not seeing the subject come even remotely close to meeting any of the criteria under WP:JOURNALIST. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that this person passes ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.