Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo (personal computers manufacturer)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please

SarahStierch (talk) 03:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Neo (personal computers manufacturer)

Neo (personal computers manufacturer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be notable enough for an article about the technology firm. There are news items about the company in ABS-CBN News (more specifically a report about a $400 netbook back in 2008) and Manila Times, but such news reports are few and far behind. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable DocumentError (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I did get a few hits from major newspapers for this company but I hesitate to add them to the article since they look like press releases. I've added a bullet list below if you want to check them out.

--Lenticel (talk) 05:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - All that seems to exist are press releases.
    csdnew 01:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.