Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neta Bomani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The page creator has been blocked as a sockpuppet, if anyone else wants to work on this article, I can move it into your User space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neta Bomani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Google News search turns up only 17 hits, none of which seem to confer notability. LinkedIn notwithstanding. A loose necktie (talk) 03:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ This article has a vaguely promotional tone, but I can't find any RS we can use. She's mentioned in passing in relation to other subjects. Oaktree b (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lacks
WP:INDEPENDENT reliable sources, also seems to be promotional Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Artists, Women, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She was a resident at
the Kitchen in New York and has been mentioned in Artnet. I'm also continuing to work on this. How many of you have long experience in editing articles about the contemporary art world, particularly of BIPOC artists? Or even created one article on a BIPOC artist? It would behoove our site if you'd take a few moments to reflect on your possible biases.--NerdyThursdays (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Biases are not a good thing, but we need coverage in reliable sources that discuss the subject at length. We can't conduct research ourselves, so this is what we have. The article is somewhat promotional; I'm more concerned that she hasn't garnered critical attention. How she identifies is secondary to coverage, otherwise she's an artist trying to make a mark on the landscape, not unlike many hundreds of others of all varieties of humandkind.Oaktree b (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Dafoe, Taylor (27 October 2021). "How Can Nonprofits Better Serve Artists? With a New $1.5 Million Program, Eyebeam Is Turning Over the Purse Strings to Its Fellows". Artnet.

Delete No coverage found, Artnet is about the best one. LinkedIn isn't a valid source and the others are from the establishment where she "works" in the art sense of the word. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fyi Oaktree b, you already made a bolded !vote above. Beccaynr (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've crossed out the first one. Ooops. Oaktree b (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy so
secondary support, such as reviews and other coverage, continuing to develop in the future. Beccaynr (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider draftifying or userfication. I also don't recommend accusing participants of having a bias, it's not a successful strategy of persuading others to your point of view.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It appears to be
WP:TOOSOON as I'm not seeing any in-depth reliable source coverage. Curiocurio (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:TOOSOON, Delete from mainspace but draftify. The artist is on her way to have her bio in Wikipedia, just not yet. Hermann Heilner Giebenrath (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] Dafoe, Taylor (27 October 2021). "How Can Nonprofits Better Serve Artists? With a New $1.5 Million Program, Eyebeam Is Turning Over the Purse Strings to Its Fellows". Artnet.