Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Chargers Stadium
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bagumba's remark concerning
WP:CRYSTAL is appropriate for this situation. The discussion of a more appropriate title should continue on the appropriate talk page. J04n(talk page) 20:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
New Chargers Stadium
No new stadium for the Chargers has never broke ground in San Diego, except that is very outdated, and no moves to Los Angeles. JJ98 (Talk) 06:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (barney) @ 08:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (gas) @ 08:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although the subject has received ]
- Keep yes the shovels haven't broken ground, but the significant coverage has been provided. Clearly passes WP:GNG. "Breaking ground" is not a requirement for notability.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At this point a "new Chargers stadium" is nothing but speculation. There hasn't even been a location chosen, much less any kind of commitment from any responsible party. Way too vague and undefined a concept for an article at this point. --MelanieN (talk) 15:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but rename to New Chargers stadium proposals or San Diego Chargers stadium proposals or similar. As noted above, significant news coverage exists for the topic, but as the other editors noted, the new stadium does not itself exist. What does exist are the various proposals over the years. Dohn joe (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename per Dohn joe. ]
- No objection to rename--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Acknowledge that there is nothing concrete as far building the new stadium, but all the significant sources regarding the planning meets WP:CRYSTAL allows articles that discuss proposals when they are sourced: "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." Renaming the article, if no consensus on the specific name here, can be done on the article talk page.—Bagumba (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.