Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Peel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Peel

Nick Peel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

When this article was created the new page patroller wrote to the creator "Sources cited are not enough to establish notability per WP:GNG, and elected officials at local government level are not automatically notable per WP:NPOL." This is my exact concern now. Coverage is very much local, routine and expected for a local government leader. Peel is lacking "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to meet

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and England. AusLondonder (talk) 16:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - local councillor. SportingFlyer T·C 16:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Politicians at the borough council level are not automatically notable just for existing, and have to pass
  WP:NPOL #2 on the basis of a hell of a lot more reliable source coverage about their council work than has been shown here. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Local politician who doesn’t meet criteria for an article. Not notable and few RS media coverage. Delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Local councillor without evidence of
  WP:SIGCOV. Contributor892z (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.