Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nijikon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. consensus against deletion Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nijikon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is something that belongs more on urban dictionary than wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flalf (talk • contribs) 12:45, 1 October 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep. Nom does not provide any policy-based rationale for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above.
talk) 16:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to
WP:OR, this can easily be summed up at the right place. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep: I see a short but well-referenced encyclopedia article. — Toughpigs (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this topic passes
WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.