Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Francis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Francis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NACTOR, and technically an unsourced BLP. Complicating the issue is that this BLP is sourced to two IMDB entries, each claiming that the subject was born under the other name, and listing different credits for each name which do not chronologically overlap. However, none of the roles appear significant enough to meet the criteria in either case. MSJapan (talk) 18:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to be convinced, but delete as it stands - no good references, no substantial roles, no evidence given of noteworthiness, and even if you were interested you'd learn pretty much nothing - David Gerard (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't pass
WP:NACTOR because she's only made appearances in minor roles so far. Minima © (talk) 09:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete non-notable actress. There is a reference to a book, but we have no more specific references. Does she recieve significant coverage a passing reference, or does her name appear somewhere in some list in the book. I doubt it is the first, because the article would at least then say something of meaning.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.