Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nkawkaw Senior High School

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nkawkaw Senior High School

Nkawkaw Senior High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing much to be notable. While I agree with

WP:SIRS already was not enough except for the schools 50th anniversary. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table:
Source
Independent?
Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward
GNG
?
https://www.ghanaiantimes.com.gh/nkawkaw-shs-celebrates-50th-anniversary/ Yes No association with subject known Yes Meets
WP:NEWSORG
Yes School is the subject of the article Yes
https://newsghana.com.gh/nkawkaw-shs-lacks-logistics/ Yes No association with subject known ~ Appears to meet
WP:NEWSORG
Yes Critical article about the school and its administration ~ Partial
https://www.modernghana.com/news/1119989/solution-to-west-african-senior-school-certificate.html Yes No association with subject known Yes Meets
WP:NEWSORG
Yes Speaks to the school's involvement with a state examination controversy. Yes
https://www.modernghana.com/news/817913/nkawkaw-senior-high-school-receives-support-from-1992-year-g.html Yes No association with subject Yes Meets
WP:NEWSORG
Yes Coverage of alumna's philanthropy to school. Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Did the nominator create this source assessment table? Because if so, it looks like they are putting forth an argument to Keep this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Per Bgv. I agree that it meets
    WP:NORG -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 16:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep: Red X I withdraw my nomination I now agree after cleaning up the article. In future, I will always be willing to clean up first before nominating. I agree with the source assessment table at least for the fact the school exists. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.