Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No More Thank Yous
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No More Thank Yous
- No More Thank Yous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mixtapes are generally not considered notable. Contested prod. RadioFan (talk) 02:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Badly formatted. No claim made for notability. No external sources. LK (talk) 02:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral - Pretty major presence, but the release needs some independent verifiable reference. My opinion floats on that determination. Shadowjams (talk) 09:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for albums. Mixtapes are generally not notable and no source contradicts this. Armbrust Talk Contribs 14:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Since when do mixtapes get their own articles? Even some albums aren't notable enough, and this mixtape certainly doesn't rise to the level of notability required. Kill it now. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 11:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.