Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Surrender (2011)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for now with no prejudice against recreation if and when the promised sources are available

No Surrender (2011)

No Surrender (2011) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable future sporting event;

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Annual event held by the second largest wrestling promotion in the world. Builds to Bound for Glory (2011). Been covered by reliable sources Pwtorch, wrestling observer, wrestleview, and slam sports to name a few.--WillC 16:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as per above. - Sir Pawridge talk contribs 15:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment can either of you please demonstrate specific evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources - either by adding links right here, or by adding them to the article? Thanks,  Chzz  ►  21:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once TNA starts announcing matches for the event, tons of information and sources will be available. At this time, only a production section could be done. As a future event, it is not expected to be fully expanded. Once a match has been announced, I will be glad to add three reliable sources to please you. It isn't hard one bit. PWTorch, Wrestling Observer, WrestleView, and Slam Sports has No Surrender all over them.--WillC 05:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly - and that's the whole point about

WP:GNG

- and, why I nominated it.

When such sources become available, then it will be fine to have an article on it. Until then, it is not.  Chzz  ►  20:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per
  WP:GNG. The page lacks a single independent source. If the event is so important, why can't we find anyone but them talking about it? BusterD (talk) 22:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.