Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctivagus (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Remove to draft. We need to.respect the earlier discussion in January and this should not.come back from draft unless independently reviewed and well sourced.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Noctivagus (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article in respect of this band has been created and deleted at

WP:NMUSIC has been satisfied. The band seems to have no notable members or output. Eagleash (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep an expand! The are one of most imortant bands of portugal in alternative goth music and they also are a pioneer (gothic rock) band in the city of Setúbal. In 2000 they go to the city of Almada(Watch the award-winning film (Documentary "Na Margem: Uma História da Rock"MUVI Festival (International Film Music Festival), 2019.(Movie Documentary who collects the rock in Almada,Setúbal about 60 Years)".*--Darwave81 (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Darwave81 is the creator of the article.Eagleash (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am :) --Darwave81 (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep!--Daliagoth (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Daliagoth: Please state your reasoning for your !vote. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Note: Daliagoth has made few edits (and only 2 to mainspace) outside of this thread. Eagleash (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning keep, as it does seem to have coverage in independent media. Possibly move to draft for improvement. BD2412 T 23:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.