Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noritoshi Furuichi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I hope that those editors who located sources could add them to the article which still needs some improvement. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Noritoshi Furuichi
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noritoshi Furuichi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable sociologist, all sources lead to Furuichi's papers. Obermallen (talk) 05:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 07:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No independent sources discussing this sociologist, based on a quick WP:BEFORE search. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:CCBF:2541:EADD:F590 (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)]
- Comment: [1] His WorldCat isn't too bad. Worth taking a deeper look to see if he passes ]
- Keep I'm not convinced meets WP:NAUTHOR given at least one independent significant review of his books (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/226953368.pdf) plus shorter mentions found on Google Books. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The nomination does not reflect community consensus on how notability works, summarized in WP:AUTHOR#3. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 08:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Hoping to see more policy-based arguments. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.