Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notemaker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notemaker

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and the article only links to primary sources. toweli (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. toweli (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only links I find are the Clairefontaine Notemaker notebook, nothing for this C64 software. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a general term, notemaker is closer to a dictionary entry rather to an encyclopedia subject. There is not enough informations to identify the hinted C64 applications (search in C64 magazines online left no clues). Articles may be created for respective applications later (eg. DocViewer may be notable). We simply do not have any sources for an article about the "Notemaker" subject. Pavlor (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is written in an advertising and promotional style. There are evaluative judgments without confirmation of this evaluation--Saul McGill (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.