Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That You Got It

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep (non-admin closure), Nominator is new to the site and unfamiliar with the WP deletion policy. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 18:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)"[reply]

Now That You Got It

Now That You Got It (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Per

• Keep Again, lots of international chart activity, plenty of independent discussion of the song - standalone article warranted.
  Townlake (talk) 03:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Keep per above, nothing wrong with this article.
  talk) 05:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Keep notable single with lots of chart activity on major charts. Indianescence (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep single from well-selling notable album, charted. -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^{Talk to me} _{The mess I've made} 13:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Speedy Keep I hate the song, and think it's really annoying. But it's clearly notable as it's an international hit (Oh and #5 in South Africa defines poor performance now, does it?) from a big-selling album and by a notable artist. SpecialK 13:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Notable single --Badgernet ^Talk 13:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]