Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office space planning

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (

non-admin closure) st170etalk 01:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Office space planning

Office space planning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a guide per

talk) 05:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk • mail) 12:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
  • I did edit this article at some stage and have no problem if it is judged to be non-compliant and removed. However, it attracts approximately 13,000 hits per year, so it appears there is need for some form of information on the subject. There are also links from this to 8 other articles on Wikipedia and these could lose readership potential if and when it is removed.

Sidpickle (talk) 15:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, though I'm quite surprised there isn't a general
    WP:OR based on original legislation. Sionk (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I think an article is needed about this subject. There is considerable OR in the article but it still passes
    WP:GNG. A maintenance tag is enough...Rameshnta909 (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.