Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official Halloween Parody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Official Halloween Parody

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film sourced to unreliable blog and review websites.TheFinalMigration (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC) (talk) 04:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 04:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - AVN, which is one of the review sources, is listed under
WP:RSP as "Generally Reliable" for pornography. That should be good enough for notability. Fieari (talk) 06:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry, no. If it was mentioned in an actual article in AVN Magazine, then that may be usable to to establish notability. However, the AVN citation is to an imdb-like entry that just lists statistical data about the film, plus a single unattributed "review". This entire section of AVN just appears to be bot- or script-generated data, e.g. look at the profiles at the end such as for Lexi Swallow, note the "Is this you or Do you represent this person? Claim This Profile" banner. This isn't journalistic prose, this is errata. Zaathras (talk) 03:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no reliable sources that establish notability of the subject. Zaathras (talk) 03:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet
WP:NFILM per review of available sources. Industry blotter is insufficient for establishing notability. --K.e.coffman (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.