Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohio Junior Classical League
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to National Junior Classical League state chapters#Ohio. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ohio Junior Classical League
Per
WP:CLUB. The only independent sourcing to this is a congratulatory notice in the Congressional Record. Reywas92Talk 19:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete The national organization is notable and is well represented by the article WP:GROUP, "Aim for one good article, not multiple permanent stubs: Individual chapters, divisions, departments, and other sub-units of notable organizations are only rarely notable enough to warrant a separate article. Information on chapters and affiliates should normally be merged into the article about the parent organization."
- BTW, responding to a comment someone made in another discussion just before it was closed: It doesn't matter if the articles about the chapters are stubs or if they are fully fleshed out articles. With rare exceptions, individual chapters of a national organization are simply not notable, per Wikipedia policy. I can tell there has been a lot of work put in here by members of the NCJL, who even created their own WP:CLUB before launching that project. I suggest that the information they have been putting here would better belong somewhere like Facebook - rather than in an international encyclopedia. --MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete individual chapters of this sort are almost never notable, and there's nothing here to indicate otherwise. I admire the devoted work of the contributors, but there a millions of uncovered notable topics. DGG ( talk ) 23:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.