Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okinawa Wrestling-Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okinawa Wrestling-Championship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestling championship. There is no significant coverage of this championship. All of the references just point to a list of wrestlers who have won the title. I also don't believe the sponsoring organization is notable, but I didn't want to clutter this discussion.

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason--a lack of significant coverage.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and also for the same reason. The annual tournament occurred once and the article is unsourced.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the creator of this article is recreating articles previously created by sockpuppets of banned user

WP:G5. Investigation and confirmation of sockpuppetry here. I'm tempted to believe this is another sockpuppet. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 22:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

and also for the same reason (these were all created by the same author/sockpuppet)Peter Rehse (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Occured only in one month of one year

Occured over a short period of time 2011-2012 with very little coverage.

delete - Speedy?? Per nom and comments. MPJ -US 20:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting disturbed by the mass creation of a number of similar articles of questionable notability (some with clear copyright violations) by what appears to be the same author under different names. Can't really append them here since this AfD has been active too long for fresh additions. User:Yu--gi-oh-gxx, User:Lovelucha, User:DragonballLover and IP:193.236.57.121 all appear to be sockpuppts of User:Martimc123 who was banned for abusing multiple accounts.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I notice since all but Lovelucha and DragonballLover have been since blocked as sockpuppts of Martimc123 -those two were not checked.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I suppose, draft and userfy I'd needed, and restart later if better. SwisterTwister talk 19:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the subjects on this nomination are notable even if the articles were re-written by a competent editor. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 01:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all None of these articles have significant and independent coverage of their subjects. Papaursa (talk) 03:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Don't meet
WP:GNG. Nikki♥311 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.