Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia O'Lovely

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia O'Lovely

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet

WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. The award listed "Urban X Award - Hall of Fame" is not significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Shame we can't keep based on looks tbh, Anyway no evidence of notability, Hasn't won any notable awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 21:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets of WP:PORNBIO. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 10:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only award win is the Urban X Hall of Fame. Editor consensus is that Urban X does not qualify as a major industry award for WP:PORNBIO purposes. The article makes no credible claim of meeting PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 10:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there is no official consensus for this. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 16:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the notability requirements for pornographic performers. It is high time that consensus against some of these non-notable awards be respected.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO per my comments above. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources to pass
WP:BASIC. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Definitely fails GNG, but man thats a nice picture - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 01:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.