Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omotunde E. G. Johnson

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omotunde E. G. Johnson

Omotunde E. G. Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:SIGCOV, the sources do not appear to substantiate notability. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. There's a few well-cited works (336,122,91) and a clutch of respectable ones (59,55,51,40); most date from c. 1970–1995 when citation density was considerably lower, particularly given that the topic isn't all that citation heavy, afaik. The subject looks to have multiple books, which should be checked for reviews; one is held by 1,294 libraries. Will try to do more research on this in the morning. ETA He wrote the (long) entry on the African Union in The Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy which doesn't speak directly to our guidelines but suggests he's regarded as an expert. ETA2 I note our article on h-index states that Google Scholar has "limited coverage of pre-1990 publications". Espresso Addict (talk) 02:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and Africa. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, In addition to echoing what Espresso Addict mentioned above, I have added a number of books which are authored by the subject. It appears that the subject comfortably meets criteria 1 of
    WP:NACADEMIC. Cirton (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Going with a formal keep, per my comment previously. Espresso Addict (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Comment Based off my search of my university database, I'm finding stuff he has written, not stuff written about him or his books (the portal has a "book review" search parameter). Same with Google searches. The Sierra Leone Telegraph likes to pull him for quotes, for what it's worth. -Indy beetle (talk) 20:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.