Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onlineworms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, although without prejudice against a future merge, subject to editorial discretion and

Onlineworms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

Fails to establish any notability. Appears to be a Korean curiosity, a knockoff of Worms 2. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 21:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the
  list of video game related deletion discussions. ZeroOne (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment on first blush it looks like some freeware knock-off, but according to this on IGN it's actually an official Team 17 game adapted by Wizgate. Bearing in mind the amount of interest generated by StarCraft in Korea there may be more to this. Someoneanother 22:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Interesting, nice find. I have edited the article to establish some more notability and to include the reference you found. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 07:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think this one appears legit and certainly has the capacity for expansion and improvement. Excellent job finding new stuff. — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for a merge and redirect I didn't find any other relevant sources for this and TBH it appears to be a curio. There is a series article or something else where all the games are listed, so this could be summed up in a sentence or two and cited to IGN, but there doesn't seem to be anything to write a full-blown article about. Someoneanother 00:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep – I'm going out on a limb and saying that, if there is coverage on IGN, there should be coverage elsewhere. MuZemike 14:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the notability is verified with Korean newspapers.온라인 웜즈[1] (온라인 웜즈 = Onlineworms)--Caspian blue 12:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.