Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open loop

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Open loop

Open loop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub since 2011. There doesn't seem to be a real topic here, maybe a definition at best, but WP is not a dictionary. Dicklyon (talk) 15:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Is this better known by a classical Greek or Latin name, like so many other terms in rhetoric? If so, it would be useful to search for the older name. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 16:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or at least move it to
    RM discussion a year ago, I looked for sources that discuss this rhetorical device and was basically unable to find any mention of it by the name "open loop" (although the term makes sense). I did find some sources that called it a "tension loop". The editor who commented above added two sources to the article about an hour ago, but I reverted the addition. One of those sources cited Wikipedia as its source and the other one quoted Wikipedia's definition of the term word-for-word (and both were written after the Wikipedia article was). I somewhat wonder whether the term "open loop" even existed with this meaning before August 2011 when the definition was put onto Wikipedia without citing a source. The article contains nothing but a brief definition of the alleged term. Such a rhetorical device certainly does exist and is frequently used, but this is not the primary name for it and we would need more than a definition to justify having an article about it. Perhaps there is a third term for it that we have not yet identified, and there might even be an article about that already. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete- My research indicates that there is no real topic here. There are concepts called "open loop" in programming and in engineering, but this just isn't a thing. Reyk YO! 10:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.