Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation LOTUS
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to ]
Operation LOTUS
Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Orange Mike | Talk 23:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The operation is in response to the worst flooding in decades in Southern Quebec. While we don't currently have an article on the flooding itself, the Fr wiki's amply demonstrate the notability. Circéus (talk) 01:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there's no reason for this article to exist, if there's no article on the flood itself. So either rename this article to become the flood article, and rebuild, or get rid of it. Ideally the flood article should also cover New York and Vermont on the shores of Lake Champlain in addition to Quebec and the Richelieu River. 184.144.168.112 (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 10:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I have created a brief and rough translation of the Operation LOTUS should be merged into it. And the page should then be replaced with a redirect to the corresponding section of that article. - Meaning of Lif (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to 2011 Lake Champlain and Richelieu River Floods without prejudice to recreation at a later date if enough infomation and reliable sources can be found to write a viable article. Anotherclown (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per Meaning of Lif ;) Buckshot06 (talk) 21:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.