Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Connecticut)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. --Ixfd64 (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Connecticut)

Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Connecticut) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this article alongside the other Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (STATE) articles.

Anyway, the deletion rationale is that

Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008
, which I am not nominating for deletion) is in a mess itself and these off-shoot articles just fork content unnecessarily.

I'd be fine with

blanking and redirecting
these entries to the aforementioned article as they appear to hold little valuable information that isn't given in the main article.

TL;DR: delete all per

WP:FORK. DrStrauss talk 22:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Florida) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Iowa) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Kansas) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Massachusetts) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Minnesota) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (New Mexico) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (New York) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Ohio) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Oregon) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Pennsylvania) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Virginia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Washington) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Opinion polling by state for the United States presidential election, 2008 (Wisconsin) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 23:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 23:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @DrStrauss:, please tag and list here all articles to be deleted, or they will not be affected by the outcome of this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  10:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.