Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OptionRally

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OptionRally

OptionRally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Reason was "The referencing is seriously lacking. This appears to be

WP:42
. References that do not comply with this need to be replaced."

I analysed the references in this version (or thereabouts) as follows:

One of those references has since been replaced with a reference that doesn't even mention the org. What we have here is

WP:BOMBARD. Fiddle Faddle 21:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am in the process of responding to User:Timtrent's concerns on the OptionRally talk page. I would appreciate if more of a discussion could be cultivated around this page's deletion. I'm invested in learning how to create strong articles, but I need constructive criticism, not just calls for deletion. User:Timtrent has taken his time in clearly explaning his reasons, but I would appreciate hearing from other users.
@Don4of4: Why do you say this does not even meet nominal notability? Mayapalm (talk) 07:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closing admin The contributing editor has asked on the article's talk page that this discussion be extended for a further period (ie relisted)). I am placing this request here on their behalf and am doing so in a neutral manner. Fiddle Faddle 13:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would ask for an extended 7 days, as I believe tomorrow is the last day. Thank you. Mayapalm (talk) 14:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • As, indeed, they have now done in person. Fiddle Faddle 22:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Failure to establish notability. Maproom (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Relisting per contributing editor's request Natg 19 (talk) 01:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 03:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OptionRally&oldid=1138187713"