Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange Holland
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
]Orange Holland
- Orange Holland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No Notability per
WP:ORG established. Considering it was a political movement as claimed, the founder Kees Bierma would have been a politician, not actor. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete: As and per nom. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I am suspicious about this article. "Orange Holland" seems to be the name for the national football team of the Netherlands, not a political group. I couldn't find an article about the group or its leader at De Telegraaf http://www.telegraaf.nl/ I can't find a reference to the group in the Dutch Wikipedia.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not really a name for the football team, merely a phrase that is likely to come up in connection with the team, which is associated both with the color "orange" and the name "Holland". However, I have also been unable to find any online references; I suspect this may be a hoax (and even if it's not, it's almost certainly not notable). Ucucha (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:55, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Near certain this is a hoax. Buggie111 (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – another hoax, and not even entertaining. --Lambiam 19:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Hoax. SL93 (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no point dragging this discussion along if this article is a hoax. 11coolguy12 (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.