Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced fancruft article which fails

Yoenit (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to A Song of Ice and Fire, trimming appropriately in the process. Jclemens (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete- Overly lengthy article about minor aspects of a work of fiction. There are no independent sources at all, just the books themselves and a fan club, and sourcing an article entirely to the work of fiction itself is very dubious. It does nothing to establish notability, and is inherently prone to original research concerns because it's not actually sourced to the work itself but to editors' interpretations of it. I do not agree with a merge suggestion because I have had a look at A Song of Ice and Fire and in my opinion it already has all the plot summary it needs. Reyk _YO! 19:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Reyk. Karanacs (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no independent sources to
WP:verify notability as per Reyk. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. And just to make the point clear, per Reyk. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.