Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orkut Büyükkökten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (

Orkut Büyükkökten

Orkut Büyükkökten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Famous for making Orkut, and being sued for making Orkut. As he has not notability except for his relation to Orkut, either delete or merge with Orkut. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I do not feel a valid reason for deletion has been given. The nominator seems to by applying
  Barak Obama since his only claim to notablity is in relation to the office of the President? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Striking unneeded and poorly thought out metaphor. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The inventor of a notable web service like this is notable. It's enough of an accomplishment. DGG (talk) 04:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per
  Sign here! 04:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep His work with Orkut is plenty significant. Eauhomme (talk) 05:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - but I would like to see the article fleshed out a bit, if it is to stay. But for the moment, keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tris2000 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.