Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlino swing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 01:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orlino swing

Orlino swing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Neologism, prod remove by author. Claim of notability made, cannot be verified

• Comment Author has changed page to read "post set for deletion", possible speedy due to author's request?
  Wildthing61476 13:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• delete, term does not show when googled. --
  Pinkkeith 19:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The Orlino swing is a slang term that is gaining popularity. I dont see why you would delete cool new phrases before they become universal. I am an equity trader in North Carolina and the term is frequently used.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.117.232.130 (talk • contribs)

KeepI trade for a living and I have Orlino Swings almost daily, it is a very common term in day trading.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.117.232.130 (talk • contribs)

• DeleteThe day trading community must not post to the Internet very much; zero Google hits suggestsno
  reliable sources to indicate notability. as protologism. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Keep This is in fact a term used in day trading although it is not written about due to the fact it is slang, but non the less a term used with an increasing amount of regularity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NYdaytrader77 (talk • contribs)

• Delete belongs on urban dictionary dot com, not on wikipedia. Mindraker 20:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, hoax, the only Paul Orlino in Google is a high school graduate from 2001, hardly a "grizzled" old trader. Corvus cornix 20:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete junk, another attempt to legitimate a protologism using Wikipedia. JuJube 21:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A cool neologism that gets 0 ghits?
  WP:NOT. It is an Encyclopedia. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - no reliable sources -- Whpq 16:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• The author has blanked the page and replaced it with "post set for deletion". I've reverted it as there is reasonable doubt that he wants it deleted for now, but I've told him to tag the page as {{
  db-author}} if that is the case. Stifle (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.