Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out Of Court

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out Of Court

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article gives no indication of notability. google search shows one link proving the movie exists, but unfortunately proving film is not notable, as it says that the film has not even been submitted to any film festivals. unless someone can find some really solid references, this should be deleted (article would of course need massive rewriting and trimming, and removal of obvious promotional links, but those are not reasons for deletion) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. The bar at
Chick Bowen 00:36, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

i agree the official bar for films, books, records is too high, as many items that dont meet the criteria are likely here to stay. i try to only delete clearly (to me) nonnotable items, and err on side of inclusion.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.