Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out ta Get Me
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to talk) 08:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Out ta Get Me
- )
Short stub on a non-notable song that was not released as a single, and failed to chart. Lack of sources indicates lack of independent third-party coverage. Fails
Beta) 21:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- As an additional note, Beta) 21:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Why do you want the redirect deleted?OnRoids 20:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I only want the redirect deleted if the article is deleted too. That way, we avoid yet another broken redirect. ;P Beta) 20:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I misunderstood. I thought it redirected to the album. Thanks for the explanation.OnRoids 21:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I misunderstood. I thought it redirected to the album. Thanks for the explanation.
- I only want the redirect deleted if the article is deleted too. That way, we avoid yet another broken redirect. ;P
- Delete as non-notable song, will likely get undone if redirected. Not enough sourcing, no notability asserted beyond being by a notable act. Don't worry about the redirect, it'll get deleted if the article does too. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A non-notable single that should have been redirected to Appetite for Destruction long ago.
On a side note, User:Crazysuit apparently did leave a mention on Appetite for Destruction's talk page. Sorry, wrong proposal. just a little insignificant 21:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Appetite for Destruction. No reason not to. The stub as it stands has a source (perhaps added after the AfD started) so it is legitimate to add the information to the album article. I should note that allmusic shows a cover version, but the artist does not seem to have a Wikipedia article and so may not be notable.Rlendog (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect - with OnRoids 20:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.