Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outglow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outglow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this PHP framework is notable. –

ebraminio^talk 07:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 15:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lack of sources means that this framework seems not to meet either
WP:NSOFT even if sources are found. -- BenTels (talk) 00:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.