Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oval Books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oval Books

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources are verging on farcical themselves (brief mentions or book recommendations, only one real review of one of their books). Primefac (talk) 14:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not-notable minor publishing house. Related company

Bluffer's Media Limited has just been created: am suggesting speedy deletion.TheLongTone (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.