Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owais Nazeer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 05:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Owais Nazeer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by User:Babatundero, a sockpuppet of MehulWB, who was blocked for paid editing. This developer is known for only one game, which doesn't yet have its own article. I definitely respect his abilities in creating the game at the age of 18, and it's true that he was mentioned in the press, but his notability is inseparable from the game he wrote, and in the case of marginal notability coupled with articles-for-pay, I'd rather err on the side of deletion. Slashme (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 22:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 13:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 13:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as although the article is neat and sourced, the sourcing isn't entirely what it could be and my searches found nothing immediately better, so delete for now and start again when better. SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —

Talk 11:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.