Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Hill

Owen Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Author whose only claim to fame is that one of his books was reviewed by the chicago tribune Jac16888 (talk)

• Delete per
  WP:BLP due to a lack of sources. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete The article says it is based on info from Hill himself and from what is apparently his website. Needs more second/third party sources. No prejudice against future re-creation if his future books gain good reviews and he gets substantial coverage in reliable sources to satisfy
  WP:BIO.I could find no sources to add to the present article. Edison (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per Edison's friendly and logical reasoning. --Lockley (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.