Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Cycle Workshop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:38, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Cycle Workshop

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded by

WP:AUD is insufficient. The one national-level source I found mentioning OCW is this Telegraph article, which is about another organization entirely. There's just not enough here to substantiate a whole standalone article." Removed without explanation. Reywas92^Talk 06:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's now a successor organisation, Broken Spoke, which has attracted national coverage. The worst case would be merger under a broader title such as
WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 09:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Andrew D. (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable even if it does still exist, it's nothing but a local store that sells and educates about bikes like the thousands of such around the world;

WP:SPA that wrote this) wants to promote about their organization. Nothing more than a sentence would belong in either of those articles but that's welcome. Reywas92^Talk 17:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per my original PROD rationale, but in the interest of fairness I should point out that there actually was a comment by AlexAndrews on the article's talk page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per original PROD by PMC. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 00:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.