Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozzy Osbourne's 10th Studio Album
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ozzy Osbourne's 10th Studio Album
AfDs for this article:
- Ozzy Osbourne's 10th Studio Album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
copy of Black Rain; the idea of a 10th studio album obviously fails
WP:HAMMER, but he removed the prod, so here we are. Ironholds (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Speedy delete perWP:HAMMER, not a source in sight. Copy of Black Rain removed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - wasn't there just recently another AfD for Soul Sucka, the album's other potential title? We should just tell the users behind these articles to be patient, WP isn't going anywhere. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - User:Drdirtyjr removed the AfD inappropriately. I have restored it. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm a fan of Ozzy Osbourne, but it fails ]
- Note - see also previous AfD discussion under slightly different article title at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozzy Osbourne's 10th studio album. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not enough sourcing to merit an article yet. Rlendog (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.