Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POP Telecom
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on
]POP Telecom
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- POP Telecom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company not
WP:GNG-worthy source.
Nothing here, either in the current version of the article or in any past diff that I've viewed in the edit history, is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have proper referencing. Bearcat (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
]
Nothing here, either in the current version of the article or in any past diff that I've viewed in the edit history, is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have proper referencing. Bearcat (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and United Kingdom. Bearcat (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.