Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PULL MY CRACKER

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per A9. While it was declined the first go round, it's about as A9 as you can get. Smashville^talk 22:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PULL MY CRACKER

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable song by non notable group without article. A9 speedy declined, despite clearly fitting the criteria. WuhWuzDat 16:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non notable group. Not even mentioned in Google News archives. --John Nagle (talk) 19:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Due to both Naked Sunday and Martyn Stayner both being redlinks (which means that the CSD should have been granted - if a band is non-notable, their songs are automatically non-notable). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 22:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.