Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Technical College
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pacific Technical College
- Pacific Technical College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication given of notability of subject. ref is to website only. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This appears to be a vocational school. I'm not finding substantial reliable source coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a degree-granting institution, fails GNG. No independent coverage found. All Google News Archive hits are for the unrelated Australia-Pacific Technical College. --MelanieN (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, talk to me! 10:07, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A stub with near-zero content, zero references and no indication of wp:notability. What's here can be recreated in 1 minute if notabiliity were ever established and a real article started. North8000 (talk) 12:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:28, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete should have been speedy for no assertion of notability. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.