Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palki Sharma Upadhyay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Two of the three Keep votes here are based on an article that isn't about her, and an unreliable one. I agree with the comment about unreliable sources; I see Reddit and more than one blog. There is a possbililty that this article could be improved with better sourcing; please contact me if anyone would like it restored to Draft: space to work on. Black Kite (talk) 18:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly recreate this page. Gaming doc (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palki Sharma Upadhyay

Palki Sharma Upadhyay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in sources to meet

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 10:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : She has received a well-known and significant award link and won significant attention link. ~Manasbose (talk) 11:21 24 April 2020 (UTC).

The first source says that her channel has won the award for a show hosted by her. And the second source is not a reliable one.

talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

The first source is also not independent (or even reliable) as it is owned by the same company that owns the channel which puts the notability of the award in question. The whole thing appears like PR gimmickry. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails

• Delete Much of the references on the article as of now are unreliable. On a random search, one is able to find two coverages, out of which only one from India.com is third-party. Fails
  WP:SIGCOV. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 02:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per Manasbose. Rest of the arguments here lack any sense. Wareon (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manasbose the creator of this page misrepresenting the sources.-

talk) 09:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Passes
  JPost,[1] The Quint,[2] and has been cited elsewhere.[3] Raymond3023 (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Writing articles for different media agencies doesn't make someone notable, it just makes them a journalist. Notability is not

WP:INHERITED neither from the media agencies they have worked in nor from the people or objects they interact with during their work. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.