Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pallavi (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Feel free to improve, expand, or renominate for deletion if so desired.

SarahStierch (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Pallavi (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to verify any of the content here. IMDB lists three actors known as Pallavi and none appear to be this one. That may be a limitation of IMDB, but I couldn't find reliable sources to use in this article. It is entirely unsourced and if she did prove to be notable would need a fundamental rewrite. Michig (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Interesting case! The article is written in such a promotional tone, that it is difficult to take anything it says at face value. The facts, if true, would make the subject easily notable per
India prject noticeboard to see if editors more familiar with Indian film related articles and sources have better luck. Even if retained, the article will need considerable de-crufting and clean-up. Abecedare (talk) 02:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep – Notable actress in South India during the 1980s. The article mentions that Kumudam, a leading Tamil magazine published an issue on her. Articles badly written doesn't necessarily mean that they should be done away with. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True, but we need to be able to
verify that she satisfies our notability guidelines. The article has been here for five years without any sources. --Michig (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Here's an article about her on Hindu and one more which am not very sure. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

neither being an animal rights supporter nor being a political campaigner as described in those Hindu articles come anywhere near the threshold of Notability. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 16:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – There simply isn't enough reliable sources to meet GNG and i don't feel those sources indicate enough notability.Blethering Scot 18:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete if the claims made in the original version were true, she would certainly meet the notability requirements. However, none of those claims appear to actually be
WP:GNG. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Will easily pass
WP:NACTOR. There are quite a few movies linking to article. Unverifiable claims can be removed and replaced with a Filmography section. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.