Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paniko Gham

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paniko Gham

Paniko Gham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per

WP:NBOOK and a lack of significant coverage. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 00:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

*Delete - insufficient coverage to meet the relevant notability guideline. Only one article and not of significance.

talk) 11:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 02:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep passes c#2 of NBOOK. Lil-unique1 "Presumed notable" means "presumed to pass the GNG", that's community consensus. You need to make a case why that presumption should not apply. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, meets
    WP:NBOOK as having won a major literary award. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep Meet
    📪 18:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.