Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paperon Intelligence Agency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not enough discussion to agree on any particular redirect target - I have no objection to someone re-creating this article as a redirect to one of the recommendations in the discussion, but there wasn't enough discussion to establish a consensus for any particular target. ST47 (talk) 01:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paperon Intelligence Agency

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not follow Wikipedia's notability standards; is more suited to IGN or Wikia/Fandom; SEE:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_manual,_guidebook,_textbook,_or_scientific_journal

talk) 16:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 17:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of James Bond parodies and spin-offs if a source can be located. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Donald Duck pocket books I think be the best option. Wgolf (talk) 01:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:30, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.