Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Participant Marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Participant Marketing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. The only sources I found using this term are referencing Daina's book. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this non-notable newly coined term. There is no indication that it is making any progress into common usage. --Stormbay (talk) 03:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No notability. SL93 (talk) 17:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a recently coined term (probably to promote their consulting business). It does not seem to have caught on. As described in the article, I am unable to see the difference between "participant marketing" and "social media marketing". -- Whpq (talk) 16:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.